History & CultureMental model

A fingerprint lies less often than a letter.

Sources split into two kinds. Relics arise incidentally: tools, rubbish, invoices, fingerprints. Narratives are told deliberately: chronicles, letters, monuments. Relics count as more credible because nobody composed them for you. The same questions apply to both: when, where, by whom, from what, in what form, with what evidential value.

Useful: For any source, first ask whether it was made for you or merely left over by accident.

Source: en.wikipedia.org

Denkwerkzeug Methode Quellenarbeit

Difficulty:

Related cards

Do great men make history, or does history make great men?In 1840, Thomas Carlyle declared that world history was 'the biography of great men'. Herbert …
Longue durée: reading history at three speeds.In 1949, the French historian Fernand Braudel distinguished three layers of time: events like …
Presentism: judging the past by today's yardstick.Presentism means judging people of the past as if they had your knowledge and your values. A doctor …
Source criticism: four questions before you believe a source.Historians test every source with fixed questions: Who wrote it? When, and how close to the event? …
Why every collapse looks 'inevitable' in hindsight.Hindsight bias makes you treat an outcome you know as having been predictable. The fall of Rome …
Why the past seems to consist entirely of stone palaces.What you know of an era is what survived: stone churches rather than wooden huts, letters of the …
The trap of reading history as a road leading to us.In 1931, the historian Herbert Butterfield criticised 'Whig history': narratives in which …
"What if not?" is a measuring tool, not a game.To say how important a cause was, you have to ask what would have happened without it. In 1964 …

Keep reading

This card belongs to the topic History & Culture. Every card is short, cites a source and can be saved – due ones come back by themselves later.

About Doomlearn · Projects · Legal notice · Privacy · Terms